“A Serious Need for a full Construction Performance Audit”
Submitted to The Star newspaper, KL, Malaysia
on 22nd December 2009
I refer you to the front page news report “Roof Disaster II” today in The Star (22.12.2009). The recent spate of public building disasters over a short period of time (involving the Sultan Mizan Z.A. Stadium, the Sultan Mahmud Airport Terminal, the Batu Burok Aquatic Complex and yesterday's collapse of the Skylight Reflector of a bus terminal in Kuala Berang etc) is an imminent indication that there is a need for a serious overhaul on the current construction practice by contractors in the State of Terengganu.
Public Contract Governance and Responsibility
Due to the public nature, scope and extent of the disasters, the government must take immediate governance action to resolve the underlying problems relating to the construction performance involving public buildings in Terengganu and elsewhere in other States where similar situations have occurred over the past decades.
Independent Certification and Verification
It is interesting to know how these public buildings which were certified to be fit in the first place totally failed the fitness test subsequently after approval. It is believed that the Certificates of Fitness in question may have been issued without conducting thorough building fitness analysis and material test performance. Even if such tests have been conducted by the relevant authority, there is no certainty that these data is a true reflection of legal compliance when there is no independent testing party to verify the same. Approved and pre-approval certification process must therefore be subjected to a new and independent standard of test confirmation/verification process.
Public Contract Tendering Process
In the award of public contracts, contractors engaged in constructing public buildings must be subjected to the same rigorous private tender process to select only suitably qualified developers/contractors who will complete such projects according to schedule, construction best practice and statutory provisions. In this regard, it is advisable to elect only contractors from the higher Grade category who have the financial means apart from construction experience to comply with all safety, environmental, building and construction specifications.
If a lower Grade category contractors are given the opportunity to execute public project, it must be made abundantly clear that the construction works must be supervised by a construction committee comprising of certified construction experts. Perhaps, CIDB, the Works Ministry, the relevant District Councils and the Contractors Associations etc could work together to map out a common best practices framework with regards to the award and performance of public project contracts.
“Public Construction Policy”
The best approach forward is for the government to map out an integrated national “Public Construction Policy” to ensure smooth compliance, co-operation and understanding by all stakeholders with a view to rectify a horrendous building and construction record since the collapse of the Highland Towers in 1993.
The above proposals could also be incorporated into the current government's Key Performance Indicators(KPIs) assessment and will contribute to long term achievement in the respective National Key Results Areas(NKRA).
……………………………………
Jeong Chun Phuoc
Lecturer-in-Law
and a reader in Strategic Environmental Intelligence(SEI)
The writer can be reached at Jeongphu@yahoo.com
* Submitted to The Star newspaper, KL, Malaysia on 22nd December 2009